Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX B360-G GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B360-G GAMING  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190320
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 10:06
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$135
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 449
61% 452 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 78.1
Parallax 95.2
0% 57.8 fps
MRender 76.9
Gravity 73
Splatting 63.9
58% 71.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000BUCT-63PUZY0 500GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 32 34 33 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 59.9
Write 59.5
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 28.9
35% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 50%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
222GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 174
Write 136
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 73.8
146% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 71%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
630GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 8.2
Mixed 5
SusWrite 1.7
9% 7.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 40%
ST2000VM 003-1CT164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 1.4 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.4% Poor
Read 162
Write 140
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 5.2
111% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.5% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 21.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 22.4
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B360-G GAMING Builds (Compare 2,381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B360-G GAMING - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback