Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DX58SO
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101214
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateApr 25 '18 at 04:17
Run Duration550 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$84
J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 156
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 332
40% 308 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Gigabyte(1458 36E2) 1GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 20.6
19% 20.3 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 24
Splatting 16.8
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.8% Below average
Read 253
Write 132
Mixed 116
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 7.37
47% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 19.5
DQ Write 25
DQ Mixed 24.5
18% 23 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 92%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
2TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 103
Write 192
Mixed 120
103% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 5.23
4K Mixed 0.76
211% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 172
Mixed 153
122% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.17
64% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 153
Mixed 156
121% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.23
86% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
451GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 112
Write 84.9
Mixed 105
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.39
90% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 68%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 25.7
Mixed 27.6
35% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 40%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
539GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 25.7
Mixed 27.9
36% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.25
65% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 40%
TOSHIBA MK5059GSX 500GB
449GB free, PID 70f1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 24.3
Mixed 25.1
33% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 0.28
4K Mixed 0.16
17% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 20%
ST2000VM 003-1CT164 2TB
350GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.4% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 25.5
Mixed 17.9
30% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.15
33% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 44%
PI-210 USB 2.0 Drive 320GB
250GB free, PID 0064
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.11% Terrible
Read 15.8
Write 15.2
Mixed 8.27
16% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.27
48% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.11%
Great: 19%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB
117GB free, PID 1f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 25.7
Mixed 26.7
35% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.3
69% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 21%
Seagate Backup+ RD 1TB
8GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 92.8
Write 95.2
Mixed 82.8
116% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.32
74% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.6% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 11.1
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 12.2
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback