Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8300 3,228 User benchmarks, average bench 24% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Memory 20.4 1-Core 13.5 2-Core 27.7 13% 20.5 Pts	4-Core 44.9 8-Core 46.4 6% 45.7 Pts	64-Core 50.7 3% 50.7 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 106E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.06% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 1.81 Parallax 1.44 1% 1.43 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.39 2% 1.75 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.06% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hynix HCG8e 63GB 472 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.3 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 145 Write 73.1 Mixed 99.4 23% 106 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 8.73 4K Mixed 2.33 29% 8.48 MB/s	DQ Read 29.8 DQ Write 7.7 DQ Mixed 4.1 7% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 24%
Generic SD02G SD Card 2GB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free Firmware: 3.8 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	9.88% Terrible	Read 22.1 Write 10.7 Mixed 14.1 12% 15.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.17 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 218% 1.74 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 9.88% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.6 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 2.5 8% 2.77 GB/s	Latency 317 13% 317 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM