Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '19 at 17:15
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 197
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 364
48% 362 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 134
Parallax 114
101% 124 fps
MRender 96.6
Gravity 122
Splatting 104
88% 108 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 104 44 39 39 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 339
Write 193
Mixed 223
SusWrite 75.2
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 39.6
131% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 142
117% 168 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
931GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 224 231 234 233 235 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
72.7% Very good
Read 248
Write 237
Mixed 236
SusWrite 229
54% 237 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 39.1
128% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 198
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 133%
WD WD360GD-00FNA0 37GB
22GB free
Firmware: 31.08F31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 58 57 57 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 52
Write 56.8
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 57.3
37% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 36%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
691GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 54 59 55 62 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 95.2
Write 82.5
Mixed 77
SusWrite 60.5
59% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
0GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 57
Write 51
Mixed 38.7
36% 48.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
92% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D63I1B16 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $564
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback