Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121019
Uptime11.2 Days
Run DateOct 11 '17 at 12:07
Run Duration461 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 400e
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Memory 52.3
1-Core 31.9
2-Core 63.3
32% 49.2 Pts
4-Core 91.3
8-Core 91.9
12% 91.6 Pts
64-Core 90.5
6% 90.5 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Gigabyte(1458 3500) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 364.72
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
8.69% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 8.47
8% 10 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 11.4
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.69%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
196GB free
Firmware: SD1A
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.78
1% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 59%
WD WD360GD-00FNA0 37GB
32GB free
Firmware: 33.08F33 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 64.1
Mixed 60.7
46% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.21
71% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 36%
WD WD360GD-00FNA0 37GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 33.08F33 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 42.4
Write 43.8
Mixed 37.8
31% 41.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.43
100% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
25.7% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10.1
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 Builds (Compare 1,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback