Today's hottest deals

Asus B85-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '19 at 11:12
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 192
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 410
53% 400 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 21
19% 20.7 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 17.6
18% 22.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD340 256GB-$194
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN423b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 295 298 298 299 301 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 403
Write 294
Mixed 262
SusWrite 296
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 44
149% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 146
154% 253 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$82
144GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 177 177 176 177 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 114
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 176
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
694GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 125 128 129 127 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 124
Write 80
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 127
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 101%
Samsung HD503HI 500GB-$41
464GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 109 110 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 109
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 58%
JMicron Generic DISK00 320GB
296GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 35 35 34 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 34.3
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 34
45% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 44%
JMicron Generic DISK01 320GB
227GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.4 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 39
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 4.8
33% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF KVT8FP-HYC 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 1,371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus B85-PRO GAMER - $504

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $924
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback