Asus N550JV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus N550JV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N550JV
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131119
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateOct 24 '16 at 09:28
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 29.4
2-Core 62.4
42% 58.4 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 244
21% 178 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 11CD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 3.54
Parallax 3.59
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.17
3% 3.61 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 381
Write 335
Mixed 312
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 11.2
61% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 71.6
DQ Mixed 59
58% 94.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 126%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
438GB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 37.9
Write 37.3
Mixed 19.9
39% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.31
79% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.6
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7.3
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N550JV Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N550JV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $450
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback