Asus B75M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus B75M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140707
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJun 04 '20 at 18:23
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 504
58% 450 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Lighting 44
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 40.5
36% 38.2 fps
MRender 35.9
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 34.5
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 195 123 64 83 68 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54% Above average
Read 250
Write 238
Mixed 216
SusWrite 109
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 26.5
93% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 148
123% 178 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54%
Great: 88%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 2TB-$121
102GB free
Firmware: CV27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 190 195 195 197 197 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 193
Mixed 78.6
SusWrite 180
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
560GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 86 87 88 88 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 80.7
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 84.5
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
57GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 105 107 103 107 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 108
Write 107
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 99.9
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 55 62 64 65 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 47.9
Write 58.6
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 60.4
41% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.4
133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
222GB free, PID 2320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 75 74 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 108
Write 80.7
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 73.2
103% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 42%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
620GB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.6 1.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Read 7
Write 6.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 1.7
5% 4.22 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
15% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.07%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FLFF65F-C8MF9 830B M2F2G64CB88B7N-CG Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 18GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.6% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 12.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-PLUS Builds (Compare 744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback