Today's hottest deals

Asus N550JV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus N550JV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N550JV
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 12:29
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 51.9
1-Core 22.4
2-Core 58.6
29% 44.3 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 275
25% 212 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 11CD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.11% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 4.9
2% 4.3 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.11%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 96 101 99 100 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 138
Write 114
Mixed 131
SusWrite 99.4
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 15.8
52% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 90.9
77% 113 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 61%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 100 104 101 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 85.7
Write 105
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 99.2
62% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LS1KBG/4G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N550JV Builds (Compare 616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N550JV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $447
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback