Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Memory 68.5 1-Core 60.9 2-Core 104 48% 77.7 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 351 34% 282 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% PowerColor(148C 2372) CLim: 1279 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.7.5 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.8% Below average	Lighting 37.9 Reflection 0.04 Parallax 72.9 31% 36.9 fps	MRender 62.5 Gravity 52.9 Splatting 52.3 45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 848GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 837 459 465 453 460 458 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 758GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 275 263 288 289 245 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Read 412 Write 404 Mixed 383 SusWrite 262 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 58.4 4K Mixed 34.3 123% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 71.6 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 90.5 84% 124 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 123 166 137 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	76% Very good	Read 127 Write 139 Mixed 45.9 SusWrite 138 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 105%
Seagate Expansion Desk 500GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 275GB free, PID 331a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 9.1 9.5 9.1 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	4.49% Terrible	Read 8.5 Write 10.4 Mixed 9.9 SusWrite 10.6 14% 9.85 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 14% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.49% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 21,220 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	29% Poor	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 9.7 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 63%

Destroyer

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 50%

Yacht

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	4x
99U5403-159.A01LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 52%, 29 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	3x

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $602