Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 17:06
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 130
60% 96 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 383
38% 310 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1401) 2GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33% Below average
Lighting 41.4
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 40.1
34% 48.4 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 40
Splatting 37.7
32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 22 67 89 15 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 347
Write 134
Mixed 218
SusWrite 50.5
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 25
94% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 106
103% 164 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 100%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
134GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 120 121 122 122 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 113
Write 104
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 116
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Dark-1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 15.5
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback