Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120502
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 21:06
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 94.2
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 194
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 327
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.46% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.83 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.46%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 247 248 214 231 253 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 335
Write 174
Mixed 226
SusWrite 238
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 20.4
76% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 53.3
DQ Mixed 118
100% 155 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 76%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$49
386GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 161 161 161 153 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 142
Write 124
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 159
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Dark-1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 22
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 17.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $292WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback