Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '19 at 09:39
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 812
73% 616 Pts
64-Core 1,127
70% 1,127 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 36BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.2% Average
Lighting 55.1
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 56.2
45% 58.8 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 54.2
Splatting 55.3
49% 60.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 32 46 57 41 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 449
Write 118
Mixed 131
SusWrite 37.4
40% 184 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 10.9
65% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 38
DQ Mixed 1
21% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 53%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
287GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 457 371 373 373 373 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 486
Mixed 446
SusWrite 390
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 57.7
193% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 370
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 121%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
398GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 155 153 157 157 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 171
Mixed 110
SusWrite 156
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
198GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 102 103 104 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 100
Write 97.5
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 102
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58%
Great: 88%
STM35004 18AS 500GB
93GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 86 87 86 87 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.8% Below average
Read 81
Write 88.5
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 87.1
109% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 46%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
506GB free, PID ce23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 39
Write 38.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 38.5
50% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FBD1 CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.8% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 20.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $417
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback