Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 09 '19 at 12:33
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 763
70% 588 Pts
64-Core 1,113
69% 1,113 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 114
Parallax 97.1
89% 107 fps
MRender 97.8
Gravity 100
Splatting 102
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 45 8.1 34 23 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 390
Write 74
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 28.7
27% 126 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 18.8
64% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 44.8
DQ Mixed 42.5
41% 67.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 53%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
334GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 372 372 373 371 371 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 488
Mixed 441
SusWrite 387
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 58
192% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 371
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 121%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
374GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 156 161 160 161 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 160
Mixed 114
SusWrite 159
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
220GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 109 109 108 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 117
Write 114
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 108
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
571GB free, PID ce23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 39
Write 38
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 38.9
50% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FBD1 CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.7% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 24.3
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,449 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback