Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory18.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 07:53
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 210
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 803
72% 607 Pts
64-Core 1,119
69% 1,119 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Nvidia(10DE 1151) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.5% Very good
Lighting 98.8
Reflection 105
Parallax 104
80% 103 fps
MRender 88.9
Gravity 91.5
Splatting 84
72% 88.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 48 43 39 51 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 448
Write 77
Mixed 19
SusWrite 39.2
31% 146 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 30.1
4K Mixed 16.8
68% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 23.1
DQ Mixed 37.8
36% 60 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 53%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
271GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 323 366 368 366 365 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 487
Mixed 437
SusWrite 373
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 56.8
189% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 368
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 119%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
126GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 154 160 158 162 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 159
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
69GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 87 84 86 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 89
Mixed 52
SusWrite 85.8
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
474GB free, PID ce23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 39
Write 38.7
Mixed 29
SusWrite 38.8
49% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FBD1 CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.3% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 20.3
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 22
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,449 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback