Medion H77H2-EM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Medion H77H2-EM (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H77H2-EM
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121207
Uptime	11.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '19 at 18:28
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 106 2-Core 210 77% 135 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 509 52% 417 Pts	64-Core 514 32% 514 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 0969) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Lighting 38.9 Reflection 38.2 Parallax 49.8 32% 42.3 fps	MRender 50.7 Gravity 44.3 Splatting 35.6 35% 43.5 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung MZ7TD128HAFV-00000 128GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0200Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 37 30 37 30 56 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 41% Great: 50%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 135GB free Firmware: CC4G SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 128 160 177 133 135 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	79.5% Very good	Read 133 Write 104 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 145 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 114%
Asmt 2115 6TB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 860GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 156 155 159 158 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 143 Write 143 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 157 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.9 185% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 105%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB 332 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 654GB free Firmware: 1405 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 42 42 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	24.4% Poor	Read 43.4 Write 40.1 Mixed 37.5 SusWrite 41 30% 40.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 93%
ASMT 2105 2TB 569 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 410GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.76% Terrible	Read 31.3 Write 13.2 Mixed 23.6 SusWrite 13 25% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 51% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.76% Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 112GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 25.2 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 14 31% 24 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 19%
ST320005 42AS 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 455GB free, PID 2351 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 13 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 25.2 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 13.9 30% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 4x4GB 702 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 16.9 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 19.9 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77H2-EM Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Medion H77H2-EM

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	163x
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples	5x
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	16x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x
C400 RealSSD 64GBMicronBench 54%, 411 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 4x4GBNanyaBench 56%, 702 samples	35x
M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 830B M2X2G64CB88G7N-DG 830B M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 830B M2X2G64CB88G7N-DG 12GBUnknownBench 54%, 163 samples	27x
M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 4x4GBNanyaBench 48%, 550 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $543

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16