Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '19 at 23:12
Run Duration443 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 88
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 128
60% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 445
42% 349 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct250mx5 0 250GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 349 226 219 226 178 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 59% Great: 117%
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB
345GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 115 112 115 113 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
70% Good
Read 129
Write 41.2
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 115
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70%
Great: 77%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
211GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 87.5
Write 90.4
Mixed 64
SusWrite 75.8
59% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 54%
WDC WD10 02FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
834GB free, PID 0277
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 32
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 13.7
36% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 17%
ST350031 2CS 500GB
4GB free, PID 0277
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 30.8
Mixed 25
SusWrite 13.8
34% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 19%
WDC WD50 00AADS-56S9B1 500GB
149GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.6% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 26.7
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 13.6
32% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 17.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 13.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback