Lenovo 0578N6U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 0578N6U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 0578N6U
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '19 at 13:30
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 M 640
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 118
52% 85 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 174
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Legend(17AA 215A) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.64% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.88
Parallax 0.66
0% 0.74 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.3
1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.64%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH6i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 150 159 173 188 184 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.8% Good
Read 241
Write 181
Mixed 195
SusWrite 169
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 30
109% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 127
105% 152 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 82%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8
15GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 8.8 9 8.2 9.2 9.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 31
Write 12
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 8.4
20% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3.3
203% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT325S6BFR8C-G7 80AD HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 6GB
533, 667 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.6
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.1
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback