Lenovo 253725Q

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 253725Q  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 253725Q
Memory2.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100607
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 16 '21 at 07:41
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 540
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 69
2-Core 116
50% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 142
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Legend(17AA 215A) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.38% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.38%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 179 39 23 35 38 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.9% Poor
Read 229
Write 209
Mixed 207
SusWrite 75.4
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 1.1
32% 9.23 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 0.6
47% 114 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40
296GB free
Firmware: 0003LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 88 90 90 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 87.8
Write 85.7
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 89.3
57% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT325S6BFR8C-G7 80AD HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 6GB
1066, 1334 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.3% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 8.6
22% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback