Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20171019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '22 at 19:19
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 85.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 259
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 827
78% 649 Pts
64-Core 1054
65% 1054 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 100%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SABRENT 1TB
814GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT343.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1869 1897 1601 1055 1056 1020 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 100% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
46GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 56 68 82 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 74.4
Write 63.5
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 65.7
47% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 70%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$33
475GB free
Firmware: AX1R2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 77 78 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 27.9
Write 98.9
Mixed 17.1
SusWrite 76
40% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 62%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6
10GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 6.7 5.7 6.4 6 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 7.8
Mixed 23
SusWrite 5.8
21% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 2.9
143% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-065.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
69.6% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 19.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 21.8
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $625
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback