ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140303
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '15 at 21:45
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G2030-$24 18,277 User benchmarks, average bench 49% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 80.9 2-Core 161 55% 121 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 164 21% 161 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 34% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% EVGA(3842 3059) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4411 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Lighting 20.2 Reflection 18 Parallax 23.3 16% 20.5 fps	MRender 23.8 Gravity 18.5 Splatting 17.4 16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 128GB 4,859 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM01D0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 257 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 97 97 101 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 4576 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5573993298 (F2) Unknown 99 99 2781929983	65.6% Good	Read 419 Write 292 Mixed 303 75% 338 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 18.6 98% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 30.4 DQ Write 58.9 DQ Mixed 18.5 22% 35.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 99%
Seagate ST3750330NS 750GB-$91 1,019 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 142GB free Firmware: SN06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 80 57 103699174 (03) Spinup time 94 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2352 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 1299206997695 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 27496 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 10 (0C) Power cycle count 100 37 740 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 46 673710120 (C2) HDA temperature 40 54 68719476776 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 47 23 103699174 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	50.9% Above average	Read 92.1 Write 85.2 Mixed 78.9 64% 85.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.37 90% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 60%
Mushkin Ventura Ultra USB 3.0 120GB-$93 48 User benchmarks, average bench 140% 60GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	163% Outstanding	Read 144 Write 89.7 Mixed 93.9 130% 109 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 8.64 1,676% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 17.2 DQ Write 40.9 DQ Mixed 7.77 1,718% 21.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 269%
SMI Leef Supra 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 29GB free, PID 1000, Leef Supra Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 117 Write 85.9 Mixed 101 126% 101 MB/s	4K Read 6.65 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 1.09 111% 3.06 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 42%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72 6,221 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 20GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 163 Mixed 157 212% 167 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 4.89 581% 9.31 MB/s	DQ Read 12.3 DQ Write 10.9 DQ Mixed 1.94 482% 8.39 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	392x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	207x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	133x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	103x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	90x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	64x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	44x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 19,522 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $906

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback