Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '15 at 15:49
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 196
66% 147 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 635
62% 506 Pts
64-Core 840
52% 840 Pts
Poor: 63% Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5850
AMD(1002 0B00) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 20.1
18% 18.4 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 16.3
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.2% Above average
Read 264
Write 251
Mixed 218
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 19.8
88% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 80.3
DQ Mixed 61.5
64% 107 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
746GB free
Firmware: CC3E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 113
Write 116
Mixed 81.4
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.62
132% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 68%
Mushkin Ventura Ultra USB 3.0 120GB-$93
16GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 228
Write 164
Mixed 164
226% 185 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 12.8
2,678% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27.8
DQ Write 76.5
DQ Mixed 13.2
3,153% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 269%
Great: 269%
Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback