Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 19 '18 at 22:47
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 96
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 169
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 513
50% 413 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 191
Parallax 193
140% 185 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 174
Splatting 127
116% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 450 128GB-$80
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 265 250 271 207 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 450
Write 275
Mixed 278
SusWrite 224
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 30.1
113% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 243
186% 253 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78%
Great: 90%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$65
12GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 278
Write 264
Mixed 269
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 40.8
143% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 195
153% 207 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 84%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$40
213GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 355 396 300 265 267 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 445
Mixed 450
SusWrite 327
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 57.3
189% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 5.6
75% 179 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 111%
Great: 128%
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30
5GB free
Firmware: CC2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 71 72 61 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 55.5
Write 60.7
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 77.8
43% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 65%
STM32503 18AS 250GB
75GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.8% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 35.3
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 37.9
46% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%
SAMSUNG HM160HC 160GB
79GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 21.5
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 23
33% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 20.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 14.8
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback