HP OMEN by HP Laptop

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8257
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '18 at 19:28
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 158
58% 100 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 288
35% 271 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8257) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.45% Terrible
Lighting 4.83
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 5.03
4% 7.44 fps
MRender 6.24
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 8.78
6% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.45%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 71 81 86 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 127
Write 112
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 80.6
65% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 75%
STM32503 18AS 250GB
172GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 34 35 35 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.1% Very poor
Read 33
Write 31.7
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 34.9
43% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH HMA425S6AFR6N-TF 6GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 11.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop Builds (Compare 6,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback