HP OMEN by HP Laptop

Performance Results

Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8257
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '22 at 18:10
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 172
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 321
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
HP(103C 8257) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.19
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.74% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 11
Parallax 20.6
5% 12.5 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 9.8
Splatting 16.6
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.74%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
571GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1181 493 474 530 534 538 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,638
Write 1,451
Mixed 1327
SusWrite 625
282% 1,260 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 49.2
167% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 742
DQ Write 446
DQ Mixed 572
432% 587 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 182%
Great: 300%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
210GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 97 65 66 67 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
63% Good
Read 390
Write 223
Mixed 272
SusWrite 102
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 25.7
100% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 165
145% 214 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PJ8TFK1GM8 Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.5% Very good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 22
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 20.8
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop Builds (Compare 6,214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 62%
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback