Today's hottest deals

Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics9.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 10:32
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 238
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 691
71% 571 Pts
64-Core 670
42% 670 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 1557) 1GB
CLim: 981 MHz, MLim: 1128 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.77% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 11.3
9% 12.9 fps
MRender 17
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 11.8
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.77%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$59
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 177 166 180 173 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 302
Write 250
Mixed 270
SusWrite 170
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 44.8
165% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 189
156% 221 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 84%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$71
369GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1400 266 296 308 303 308 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,516
Write 1,890
Mixed 1,578
SusWrite 480
307% 1,366 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 90.3
307% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,542
DQ Write 1,190
DQ Mixed 1,232
958% 1,321 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 246%
Great: 295%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 169 169 170 171 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 155
Mixed 93.3
SusWrite 169
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB-$169
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92% Outstanding
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 28.6
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 28.7
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 92%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 9,169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $256

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $802
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback