User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot Drive	44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	empty empty
Motherboard	TYAN S7002
Memory	52.1 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111011
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 29 '18 at 14:41
Run Duration	387 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675 4,275 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 76.4 2-Core 154 52% 115 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 546 51% 424 Pts	64-Core 1,113 69% 1,113 Pts
Poor: 58% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 271GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 32 37 38 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.3% Average	Read 225 Write 216 Mixed 234 SusWrite 32 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 47.1 4K Mixed 31.1 88% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 36.9 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 87.4 75% 105 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 99%
HPT DISK 0_0 1TB 550GB free Firmware: 4.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 31 35 41 43 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58.5% Above average	Read 389 Write 364 Mixed 452 SusWrite 34.8 70% 310 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 58.3 4K Mixed 33.1 101% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 199 150% 198 MB/s

OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 19GB free Firmware: 2.25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 32 38 38 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.7% Average	Read 218 Write 142 Mixed 180 SusWrite 32.1 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 32.1 112% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 17.6 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 25.7 35% 59.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 82%
Adata Premier Pro SP920 256GB-$203 2,823 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 137GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 33 38 38 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.4% Average	Read 216 Write 218 Mixed 213 SusWrite 32.3 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 57.3 4K Mixed 32.1 98% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 17.1 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 50.1 55% 86.3 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 99%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 28 32 38 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Read 154 Write 101 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 32 57% 78.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 61% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 108%
Seagate BUP SL 5TB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1.5TB free, PID ab30 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 26 28 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 48.3 Write 64.3 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 26.3 54% 40.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 57%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 24 24 19 26 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 26 Write 20.8 Mixed 46.3 SusWrite 23.7 41% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 0.4 337% 3.6 MB/s	DQ Read 0.2 DQ Write 9.6 DQ Mixed 0.4 341% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 64%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 82GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 16 8.6 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 95.5 Write 94.3 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 15 80% 63.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 38% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 52%
WDC WD20 EARS-00J2GB0 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1.5TB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.9 4.9 4.9 5 5.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.5% Very poor	Read 55.3 Write 2 Mixed 9.8 SusWrite 4.9 16% 18 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 33% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 34%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 136GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.4 4.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 81.3 Write 46 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 4.6 42% 37.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 23% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 69%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA600 6TB 2TB free, PID 0611 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 24 26 28 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.6% Poor	Read 114 Write 108 Mixed 55.2 SusWrite 26 95% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.1 110% 1.47 MB/s

TOSHIBA DT01ACA3 3TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 145GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 24 26 27 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18.8% Very poor	Read 81.3 Write 49.5 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 25.8 53% 45 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 23% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 73%
Seagate BUP SL 4TB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 332GB free, PID ab30 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 26 28 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 36 Write 63.3 Mixed 54.3 SusWrite 26.1 64% 44.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.4 208% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 56%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 1,450 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 635GB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 29 35 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 21.2 Write 12.3 Mixed 49 SusWrite 28.3 40% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 19% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 49%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 772GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 25 36 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 49.7 Write 16.5 Mixed 38 SusWrite 27 41% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 35%
TS256GSS D370 256GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 130GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 25 26 28 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	109% Outstanding	Read 148 Write 93.8 Mixed 148 SusWrite 26.1 132% 104 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 25.9 4K Mixed 15.3 1,442% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 11 DQ Write 33.3 DQ Mixed 16.4 1,731% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)