Asus CM6870

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	82.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus CM6870 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CM6870
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 29 '18 at 09:19
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 86.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 185 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 516 52% 420 Pts	64-Core 512 32% 512 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8598) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.9% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 113 Parallax 96.1 85% 105 fps	MRender 95.4 Gravity 95.9 Splatting 94.7 78% 95.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 119 95 95 95 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 318 Write 196 Mixed 238 SusWrite 110 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 55.9 4K Mixed 31.2 105% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 177 132% 174 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 84%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 34GB free Firmware: 608ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 171 157 181 176 175 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 336 Write 262 Mixed 259 SusWrite 172 58% 257 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 55.9 4K Mixed 34.4 111% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 178 150% 216 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 661GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 97 97 99 100 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	55% Above average	Read 93.5 Write 86 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 98.2 62% 83.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 68%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB 244 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.2 5.5 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	5.45% Terrible	Read 22.5 Write 5.5 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 5.5 9% 9 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.45% Great: 7%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 13GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 10 12 12 12 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 63.5 Write 22.7 Mixed 9.3 SusWrite 11.9 28% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 51% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 33%
SanDisk 8GB 156 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 6GB free, PID 5576 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.7 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 21.5 Write 11.7 Mixed 10.3 SusWrite 3.8 14% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 103% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EL64C1C1624Z1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 04CB EL64C1C1624Z1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.4% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 17.2 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 17.2 48% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM6870 Builds (Compare 647 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6870

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	506x
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples	47x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	21x

GPU
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	17x

RAM
SLA302G08-GGNHC 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 881 samples	57x
EL64C1C1624Z1 4x4GBAdataBench 56%, 506 samples	47x
SLA302G08-GGNNG 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 364 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16