Asus CG8265

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus CG8265 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CG8265
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120509
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '19 at 16:23
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 182 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 465 49% 394 Pts	64-Core 475 29% 475 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 83%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15 52,547 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 844D) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Asus(1043 83AC) 1GB CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Lighting 19.7 Reflection 23.5 Parallax 17.5 16% 20.3 fps	MRender 27 Gravity 20.5 Splatting 21.4 19% 23 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 308 310 310 307 306 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Read 396 Write 304 Mixed 313 SusWrite 308 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 62.6 4K Mixed 33.2 119% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 237 208% 311 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 350GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 117 119 121 121 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 115 Write 136 Mixed 79.6 SusWrite 119 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EL64C1C1624Z1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 04CB EL64C1C1624Z1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.4% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 14.7 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 15.2 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 73.3 54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CG8265 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CG8265

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	13x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	2x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	4x
HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)Intel $15Bench 2%, 6,831 samples	2x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	3x
CT1000P3 1TBNvmeBench 283%, 903 samples	2x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 48%, 731 samples	3x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 56%, 3,905 samples	3x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 CT51264BD160B.C16F M378B5273DH0-CH9 CT51264BD160B.C16F 16GBSamsungBench 47%, 12 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $602

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16