Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '18 at 02:23
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 202
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 399
53% 399 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
EVGA(3842 3660) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.9% Poor
Lighting 30.9
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 39.3
25% 34 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 35.8
Splatting 27.1
27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 423 433 297 281 280 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 478
Mixed 453
SusWrite 331
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 53.5
176% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 366
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 112%
Great: 122%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
975GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 142 141 139 141 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 144
Write 107
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 137
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
2.5TB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 146 145 145 146 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 141
Write 109
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 138
147% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 72%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 33
Write 28
Mixed 25
SusWrite 25.2
37% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 22%
SMI USB DISK 4GB
2GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 5.5 4.5 6.6 5.6 6.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Read 8
Write 1.8
Mixed 5
SusWrite 5.4
6% 5.05 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 8%
Seatay SBOX02503 120GB
105GB free, PID 2590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 128 128 130 130 131 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
225% Outstanding
Read 298
Write 136
Mixed 124
SusWrite 127
204% 171 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 17.6
2,327% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 24.6
DQ Write 66
DQ Mixed 19.1
2,986% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 225%
Great: 225%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 86F1 i-DIMM 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 86F1 i-DIMM 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,055 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback