Asus P8P67 LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 LE  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 31 '18 at 04:11
Run Duration410 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 173
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 454
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
PwrHis(1787 2304) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.68% Terrible
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 9.96
Parallax 10.6
10% 10.9 fps
MRender 9.62
Gravity 9.37
Splatting 13.4
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.68%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 38 36 32 31 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 23.7
Write 42.6
Mixed 18
SusWrite 32.4
21% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
671GB free
Firmware: ML6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 89 90 91 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 93
Write 92.3
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 89.9
59% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 73%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
878GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 113 113 114 113 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 114
Write 87.6
Mixed 66
SusWrite 112
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
1TB free
Firmware: ML6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 100 99 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
62% Good
Read 114
Write 109
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 102
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62%
Great: 73%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
984GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 90
Write 82.5
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 25.9
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 56%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
653GB free
Firmware: ST6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 103
Write 36.9
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 11.8
34% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 61%
Seagate ST3000DM003-1F216N 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 48 50 52 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 116
Write 93.4
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 49.6
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 99%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
441GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 25 24 26 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 81.8
Write 85.7
Mixed 55
SusWrite 25.3
46% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 63%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
146GB free
Firmware: ST6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 24 22 19 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 88.9
Write 36.3
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 21.5
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 61%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
14GB free
Firmware: 1AG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8.4 8.3 8.5 8.5 8.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 59%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 26 25 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 90.5
Write 92.9
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 25.8
47% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 56%
Hitachi HTS547575A9E384 750GB
305GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 8.8 14 11 13 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.11% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 1.5
Mixed 1.2
SusWrite 12.3
6% 3.93 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 13%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
312GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 19 20 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 25.7
Write 23.9
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 19.4
31% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 59%
ST1000LX 015-1U7172 1TB
341GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 2.5 1.7 2.7 1.7 1.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 2
5% 4.75 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD63I1B16ZZEU F3-12800CL9-4GBXL AD63I1B16ZZEU F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 LE Builds (Compare 1,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 LE - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $639
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback