HP 625

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 625  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1475
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101207
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateMay 14 '18 at 07:12
Run Duration350 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion II P560
Unknown, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
42.7% Average
Memory 73.4
1-Core 36.6
2-Core 72.6
41% 60.9 Pts
4-Core 72.5
8-Core 72.8
10% 72.7 Pts
64-Core 72.7
4% 72.7 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
HP(103C 1475) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.75 fps
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.35 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 250GB
24GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 26.2
Mixed 27.1
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.15
4K Mixed 0.35
100% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 83%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
414GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 26.3
Mixed 26.9
35% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.37
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB
15GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 27.2
Write 8.06
Mixed 9.06
15% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.19
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.88
88% 1.81 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.8% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 9.8
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 625 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 625

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $48
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback