Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150515
Uptime11.2 Days
Run DateJan 09 '17 at 04:26
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$143
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 538
52% 429 Pts
64-Core 671
42% 671 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.3% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 107
Parallax 96.2
85% 102 fps
MRender 86.6
Gravity 94.5
Splatting 83.7
72% 88.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 405
Mixed 415
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 33.7
140% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 23.7
90% 200 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 100%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
170GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 177
Write 126
Mixed 130
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.07
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.26
117% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87%
Great: 109%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 250GB
4GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 140
Write 150
Mixed 119
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.17
4K Write 2.62
4K Mixed 0.31
131% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 38.4
111% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 18.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback