Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130320
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '23 at 09:59
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 96 2-Core 139 66% 106 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 437 46% 369 Pts	64-Core 451 28% 451 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.97% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 1.2 3% 3.33 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 4 Splatting 3 3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.97% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD VelociRaptor 2.5" 500GB-$122 435 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 406GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.06A00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 130 108 123 110 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 176 Write 173 Mixed 119 SusWrite 121 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.9 247% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 113%
LSI Logical Volume 16TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 926GB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 235 237 238 238 238 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Read 238 Write 220 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 236 142% 195 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 2.6 750% 6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 137%
LSI Logical Volume 299GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 245GB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 55 56 55 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 151 Write 54.7 Mixed 71.4 SusWrite 54.9 61% 82.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170EH1- 8x4GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 34.5 MC Mixed 30.7 93% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 12.8 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	23x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	3x

SSD
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	3x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	3x
Vector 256GBOCZ $240Bench 93%, 2,095 samples	2x

RAM
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	3x
M391B5273DH0- 8x4GBSamsungBench 83%, 37 samples	3x
M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A M378B5173QH0- M378B5173QH0- 44GBSamsungBench 82%, 5 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16