Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	24 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130320
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '22 at 17:21
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 95.3 2-Core 190 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 339 45% 338 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 372.70 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	7.46% Terrible	Lighting 8.7 Reflection 12.1 Parallax 8.4 7% 9.73 fps	MRender 12 Gravity 10.1 Splatting 8.6 8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 7.46% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD VelociRaptor 2.5" 500GB-$122 435 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.06A00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 127 138 163 158 169 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 166 Mixed 107 SusWrite 149 112% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 1.6 326% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 113%
Intenso External USB 3.0 5TB 224 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 337GB free Firmware: 1201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 19 18 21 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 45.4 Write 47 Mixed 32 SusWrite 20.4 27% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.3 88% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 90%
Intenso External USB 3.0 5TB 224 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 314GB free Firmware: 1201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 25 24 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	9.44% Terrible	Read 7.8 Write 33.3 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 24.4 17% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.2 69% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.44% Great: 90%
Intenso External USB 3.0 5TB 224 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 54GB free Firmware: 1201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 26 24 26 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 53.2 Mixed 37.1 SusWrite 25.7 27% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.3 88% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 90%
LSI Logical Volume 16TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 14.5TB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 16 18 18 14 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 51.2 Write 15.6 Mixed 8 SusWrite 16.2 16% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 137%
LSI Logical Volume 299GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 276GB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 57 57 57 57 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 171 Write 54.3 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 56.4 66% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 101%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB 2,049 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 12 12 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	5.55% Terrible	Read 15.8 Write 12.9 Mixed 12 SusWrite 10.6 17% 12.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 5.55% Great: 43%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 37GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 17 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 27.7 Write 18 Mixed 16.3 SusWrite 16.5 25% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.3 119% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5273DH0- 8x4GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.6% Very good	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 37.1 MC Mixed 29.6 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 11.7 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	23x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	3x

SSD
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	3x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	3x
Vector 256GBOCZ $240Bench 93%, 2,095 samples	2x

RAM
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	3x
M391B5273DH0- 8x4GBSamsungBench 83%, 37 samples	3x
M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A M378B5173QH0- M378B5173QH0- 44GBSamsungBench 82%, 5 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16