Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N270 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 20% U2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Memory 35.4 1-Core 6.5 2-Core 10.5 14% 17.5 Pts	4-Core 10.3 8-Core 10.5 1% 10.4 Pts	64-Core 10.6 1% 10.6 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Fujitsu MHZ2080BH G1 80GB 418 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0084000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 48 48 46 48 48 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 49.9 Write 48.9 Mixed 33.9 SusWrite 46.6 33% 44.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 35%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO mSAT 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 319GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.3% Very poor	Read 25.4 Write 18.9 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 19.9 28% 21.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 3.6 251% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 512, 2048 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.02% Terrible	MC Read 2.9 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.57 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.9 GB/s	Latency 225 18% 225 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.02% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16