Apple MacPro3,1

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Apple MacPro3,1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Apple Mac-F42C88C8
Memory	20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080229
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '20 at 16:13
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5462 772 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Memory 70.8 1-Core 40 2-Core 79.7 42% 63.5 Pts	4-Core 155 8-Core 317 28% 236 Pts	64-Core 314 19% 314 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.81 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	59.7% Above average	Lighting 75 Reflection 80.7 Parallax 79.3 61% 78.3 fps	MRender 73.7 Gravity 71.5 Splatting 65.2 57% 70.1 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 115GB 2,637 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 30 36 34 39 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 138 Write 49.5 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 35.1 17% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 21.4 80% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 24 DQ Write 59.4 DQ Mixed 19.9 21% 34.4 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 49%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 67 77 82 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 132 Write 125 Mixed 86.3 SusWrite 74.3 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 85%
Samsung SSD 850 PRO 1TB 536GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 13 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.7% Below average	Read 33.3 Write 26 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 13.9 33% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 7.7 556% 7.77 MB/s

JMicron 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 3GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	7.62% Terrible	Read 29.5 Write 15.3 Mixed 7.3 SusWrite 13.4 19% 16.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 9% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.62% Great: 58%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO mSAT 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 43GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 13 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.5% Below average	Read 32.8 Write 26 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 13.9 33% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 7.7 555% 7.67 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 24GB 14,716 User benchmarks, average bench 43% null MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.9% Poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 10.6 23% 8.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 4.5 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 99.6 40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MacPro3,1 Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Apple MacPro3,1

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E54621stBench 47%, 772 samples	98x
Xeon E5462IntelBench 48%, 662 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	22x
Radeon HD 2600-XTATIBench 2%, 1,081 samples	11x
GeForce 8800 GTNvidiaBench 6%, 5,568 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
8x2GBUnknownBench 114%, 8,850 samples	28x
8x4GBUnknownBench 90%, 5,222 samples	25x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $388

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16