Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '17 at 20:26
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 157
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 302
40% 298 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Zotac(19DA 3255) 3GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.6% Average
Lighting 53.7
Reflection 41.3
Parallax 56.7
44% 50.6 fps
MRender 57.8
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 40.3
40% 50.6 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 516
Write 490
Mixed 361
101% 456 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 22.3
88% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 71.7
84% 145 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 116%
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
102GB free
Firmware: X31000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.2% Average
Read 239
Write 121
Mixed 131
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 16.4
75% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 43.9
62% 117 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 93%
Crucial M4 64GB-$92
49GB free
Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 487
Write 103
Mixed 150
53% 247 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 5.85
71% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 82.1
DQ Mixed 7.56
32% 72.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 65%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
691GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 90.4
Write 81.1
Mixed 35.6
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.44
102% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-199.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-199.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,037 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $849
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback