Asrock Z77 Extreme9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme9 (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130711
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '19 at 14:48
Run Duration	238 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 78.9 1-Core 96.5 2-Core 151 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 233 31% 233 Pts	64-Core 239 15% 239 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60.5% Good	Lighting 76.1 Reflection 81.1 Parallax 72.9 62% 76.7 fps	MRender 78.3 Gravity 70.9 Splatting 64.4 58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme PLEXTOR PX-256M8 256GB 527 User benchmarks, average bench 161% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.04 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1059 Write 284 Mixed 450 130% 598 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 66.1 4K Mixed 45 153% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 818 DQ Write 358 DQ Mixed 53.4 181% 410 MB/s
Poor: 85% Great: 205%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 313GB free Firmware: CC29 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 142 Write 6 Mixed 23.5 42% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 139% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 598GB free Firmware: ABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 96 93 88 89 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 107 Write 119 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 93 64% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 139 136 149 134 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Read 149 Write 152 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 132 84% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 136% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 15GB free Firmware: ABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 92 93 94 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 95.3 Write 86.5 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 93.4 54% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 107%
ASMT 2115 3TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 196GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 120 120 119 118 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 124 Write 93.5 Mixed 60 SusWrite 119 130% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 76%
ADATA HD650 2TB 287 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1TB free, PID a35a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 148 Write 149 Mixed 52.2 141% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 43% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-199.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-199.A00LF 16GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59.2% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 19.6 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 18.2 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme9 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme9

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	25x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	17x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	7x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	5x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	9x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	3x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	8x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 24GBUnknownBench 45%, 8 samples	6x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $506

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16