Asrock B75 Pro3-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B75 Pro3-M  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '16 at 13:08
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 168
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 337
44% 334 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4195
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 3.77
Parallax 0.81
2% 2.29 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.61
2% 2.65 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.6% Average
Read 261
Write 179
Mixed 186
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 8.2
61% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 24.6
53% 109 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 95%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
212GB free
Firmware: CP100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 66.1
Write 68.8
Mixed 74.5
53% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.33
78% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 43%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46
20GB free
Firmware: P22OABEA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 49.9
Write 41.7
Mixed 51.4
36% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.25
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 39%
Toshiba MK2060GSC 200GB
6GB free
Firmware: TP112W Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 25.9
Write 26.4
Mixed 25.4
20% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.23
58% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CM3X1G1333C9 029E CM3X1G1333C9 Samsung M391B5673GB0-CH9 Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.4% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3-M - $85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $410
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback