Asrock B75 Pro3-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B75 Pro3-M  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 16 '16 at 20:42
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 83
2-Core 166
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 315
42% 311 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4195
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.04% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 0.81
2% 2.42 fps
MRender 3.86
Gravity 1.73
Splatting 2.61
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.04%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 506
Write 346
Mixed 350
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 9.15
67% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26.3
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 8.49
30% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 95%
Toshiba MK2060GSC 200GB
54GB free
Firmware: TP112W Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 37.8
Write 37.4
Mixed 33.6
27% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.26
64% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 29%
Toshiba MK2060GSC 200GB
6GB free
Firmware: TP112W Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 26.8
Mixed 25.6
20% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.27
63% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 29%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 500GB
112GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 27.9
Write 24.9
Mixed 24.5
33% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.21
60% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CM3X1G1333C9 029E CM3X1G1333C9 Samsung M391B5673GB0-CH9 Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.8% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 11
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3-M - $85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $410
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback