Hp-pavilion NP196AA-ABA e9160f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Hp-pavilion NP196AA-ABA e9160f (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Eureka3
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090428
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '18 at 17:37
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38 10,428 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Memory 76.9 1-Core 33.7 2-Core 71 41% 60.5 Pts	4-Core 139 8-Core 138 18% 139 Pts	64-Core 142 9% 142 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 1081) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 337.88 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.52% Terrible	Lighting 9.5 Reflection 8.27 Parallax 9.53 8% 9.1 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 7.67 Splatting 7.48 7% 8.89 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.52% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 508GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 168 165 176 185 184 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 182 Mixed 70.1 SusWrite 173 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 282GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 83 84 84 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 85.8 Write 84.5 Mixed 65.5 SusWrite 83.4 59% 79.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 76%
WD My Book 1140 2TB 10,094 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 438GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 23 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 23 Mixed 26.9 SusWrite 22.4 35% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 49%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 3TB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 934GB free, PID a001 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 27.2 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 20.5 34% 26.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.8 20% 7.07 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.5 20% 6.9 GB/s	Latency 86.5 46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NP196AA-ABA e9160f Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: Hp-pavilion NP196AA-ABA e9160f

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9300Intel $38Bench 46%, 10,428 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	1x

SSD
SSDSC2BA400G3 400GBIntelBench 87%, 389 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 36% - Below average

Total price: $598

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16