Today's hottest deals

Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150828
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJul 17 '18 at 03:47
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 391
52% 390 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 370
Asus(1043 86A4) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 39.8
27% 34.2 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 27.3
Splatting 34.9
25% 29.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 26%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
624GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 442 325 272 272 274 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 370
Write 454
Mixed 367
SusWrite 334
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 41.8
145% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 310
233% 311 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD Builds (Compare 1,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback