Today's hottest deals

Asus G11CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G11CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G11CD
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '22 at 13:15
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 383
49% 369 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 86DC) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.9% Poor
Lighting 30.5
Reflection 37.4
Parallax 29.9
25% 32.6 fps
MRender 35
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 27.9
25% 31.1 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GSSD230S 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 22Z0UCFJ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 386 296 284 293 295 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 381
Write 398
Mixed 375
SusWrite 304
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 55.9
185% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 144
153% 255 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 105%
Great: 111%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
8GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.5 3.2 3.3 2.1 2.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
8.49% Terrible
Read 30.7
Write 3.2
Mixed 9
SusWrite 2.9
11% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.4
92% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 8.49%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G11CD Builds (Compare 2,293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Asus G11CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback