Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+-$50 2,970 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Memory 63.2 1-Core 34.3 2-Core 67.6 36% 55 Pts	4-Core 67.5 8-Core 67.8 9% 67.7 Pts	64-Core 67.9 4% 67.9 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 31GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.6% Very poor	Read 31.1 Write 10.4 Mixed 7.58 12% 16.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.09 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 1.62 432% 2.96 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 13%
JetFlash TS32GJF300 32GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 16.5 Mixed 24.6 29% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.15 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 1.95 153% 3.02 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	20% Very poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 5.8 17% 5.9 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4000+AMDBench 31%, 2,693 samples	2x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+AMD $50Bench 34%, 2,970 samples	2x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+AMDBench 37%, 5,400 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	2x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	1x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	1x

SSD
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	1x
MX200 250GBCrucial $134Bench 95%, 26,364 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	5x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	2x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $70