Acer Aspire 5733Z

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 5733Z  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 5733Z
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 16:26
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium P6100
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 50.1
2-Core 99.7
43% 70.7 Pts
4-Core 99.8
8-Core 98.6
13% 99.2 Pts
64-Core 98.3
6% 98.3 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Acer(1025 0601) 763MB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 0.4
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 31GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 5.4 5 3.4 4.1 5.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.41% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 5.5
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 4.3
6% 7.88 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
35% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 13%
Generic- Multi-Card 32GB
0GB free, PID 0138
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.8 4.9 4.1 4.1 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.76% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 2.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 4.7
7% 5.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
8% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 2.76%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5733Z Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5733Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback