HP Z640 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z640 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212A
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150402
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 11:40
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 88
2-Core 183
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 619
57% 477 Pts
64-Core 824
51% 824 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000
HP(103C 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR15ABHA 256GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0T13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 484
Write 481
Mixed 487
108% 484 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 27.4
100% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 55.5
75% 137 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 93%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
929GB free
Firmware: A3FF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 132
Write 138
Mixed 125
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.39
102% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 74%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 125
Write 126
Mixed 79.9
138% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.09
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.18
76% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 52%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB
1TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 125
Write 126
Mixed 19
105% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.18
72% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 52%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB
520GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 123
Write 119
Mixed 75.5
132% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.21
81% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 52%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
308GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 92
Write 86.9
Mixed 49.8
94% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.47
62% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
102% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 35.6
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 21
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 102%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z640 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback