Today's hottest deals

HP 23-b237c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP 23-b237c  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AFC
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130925
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 02 '20 at 13:07
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Memory 49.8
1-Core 30.9
2-Core 59.5
30% 46.7 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 111
15% 109 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
HP(103C 2AFC) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2801.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 3.81
Parallax 2.72
2% 2.85 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 1.87
Splatting 2.83
2% 2.34 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 54 100 109 137 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 399
Write 159
Mixed 210
SusWrite 91.4
47% 215 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 13.3
51% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 19.7
DQ Mixed 33.3
34% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 56%
Seagate Expansion+ 1TB
618GB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 72 92 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 68
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 88.5
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 71%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
248GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 75 96 99 99 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 113
Write 102
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 95.5
125% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 64D0JKHNK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5.3
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23-b237c Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 23-b237c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback