Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120216
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 28 '18 at 13:37
Run Duration570 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 190
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 320
47% 343 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1260 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.2% Average
Lighting 58.7
Reflection 64.5
Parallax 72.8
48% 65.4 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 54.5
Splatting 53.3
46% 56.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 118
Write 130
Mixed 115
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.28
90% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 83.4
Write 96.2
Mixed 92.6
120% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.19
61% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 49%
Generic Flash Disk3.0 8GB
6GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.3% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 4.69
Mixed 4.3
9% 8.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.95
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.003
11% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.3%
Great: 6%
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Read 9.53
Write 4.41
Mixed 3.51
6% 5.82 MB/s
4K Read 4.65
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.009
18% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5458-001.A00LF 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 99U5458-001.A00LF 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.7% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 752 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $564
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback