Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '20 at 13:58
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 71.1
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 236
72% 135 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 481
63% 474 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 14
Parallax 19.9
12% 16.3 fps
MRender 6.38
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 20.5
13% 14.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 423 432 445 446 445 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 440
Mixed 375
SusWrite 435
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 38.3
152% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 243
186% 252 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Generic Flash Disk3.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 8.2 8.9 6.1 8.9 7.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.51% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 2.3
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 7.7
10% 8.75 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-119.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback